fbpx
Connect with us

#NNPA BlackPress

Legal Experts: Cosby Should Prevail on Appeal

NNPA NEWSWIRE — The experts also allege that prosecutors hid evidence that would exonerate Cosby and some claim that despite the high-powered and successful attorneys at his disposal, counsel was ineffective.

Published

on

By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Contributor
@StacyBrownMedia

Bill Cosby was tried and convicted without any actual evidence that his crimes had ever been committed, no police reports, no medical records, no collaborating witnesses, just the accusations of women recalling events that occurred 30 years in the past, according to Bob Law, the chairman of the National Black Leadership Alliance.

“And that is in opposition to the legal principle that the accuser cannot bring the action and also be the witness without any collaborating evidence,” said Law in a letter to NNPA Newswire that was endorsed by several others, including Bill Grace, the founder of the WEB Dubois Learning Center in Kansas City, Mo., and Marcia Harris of the nonprofit Empower to Educate in Hackensack, N.J.

Law and his group are among the growing number of experts who believe that Cosby, jailed on Sept. 25 in Pennsylvania, and sentenced to three to 10 years in state prison, should easily have his conviction overturned.

They point to what they call numerous prejudicial rulings and legal errors made by the judge.

The experts also allege that prosecutors hid evidence that would exonerate Cosby and some claim that despite the high-powered and successful attorneys at his disposal, counsel was ineffective.

“The Cosby jury verdict is being heralded as a great milestone in justice for women accusers… …but the problem is that the judge in the case rigged the trial to ensure that Cosby would be convicted,” said International Rights attorney John Davis, who practices in the South of France and who writes about gender issues.

“The trial was a terrific example of the travesty of justice in the American courtroom for sex assault trials,” said Paul Saputo, of the Saputo Law Firm in Dallas, Texas.

“As has happened throughout American history, popular culture weighs heavily on criminal justice and I obviously don’t know whether or not Cosby is guilty of what he’s accused of, but when the justice system sacrifices fairness in procedure to tilt the scales, we have a major problem,” Saputo said.

Not only did Cosby’s accuser receive a large amount of support from the government and media, Cosby became a victim of the mass media and popular culture who won’t give him a second thought, Saputo added.

Among the problematic rulings and mis-steps the experts believe include:

  • Trial Judge Steven O’Neill allowed testimony from other accusers who had nothing to do with the case.
  • O’Neill refused to allow Cosby’s team to put on witnesses who had given sworn testimony that Constand planned to shake down Cosby and lured him into a relationship to do so.
  • O’Neill allowed a juror to remain on the case after others testified in sworn affidavits that, even before testimony began, the juror proclaimed Cosby was guilty.
  • Despite compelling evidence presented by Defense Attorney Thomas Mesereau that appeared to show that the statute of limitations had expired on the more than decade old case, O’Neill refused to rule, instead asked that the jury consider it which they did not.
  • O’Neill didn’t disclose an ongoing feud he had with former District Attorney Bruce Castor, who convinced Cosby to waive his Fifth Amendment rights and sit for a deposition. In exchange, Castor agreed that the deposition could never be used against Cosby in any Pennsylvania criminal proceedings. The deposition was the primary tool used to convict Cosby.
  • O’Neill refused to recuse himself even after it was discovered that his wife donated money to a women’s group that protested against Cosby.
  • Several jurors were allowed to sit in judgment of Cosby despite revealing that they were either neighbors of court officials or had personal relationships with detectives on the case.
  • O’Neill only allowed parts of Cosby’s civil deposition admitted as evidence after defense attorneys argued that it shouldn’t be admitted at all. They also argued that if the judge was going to admit the deposition, he should allow the entire 87-page document to be presented to the jury for context.

“The alleged deposition transcript does not show Cosby drugged women without their knowledge in order to incapacitate them so that he could rape them,” said Oxford alum Jonathan Farley. “But, a juror admitted that he voted to convict Cosby based on this false belief,” Farley said.

If Castor hadn’t promised Cosby that the deposition could never be used against him, Cosby could and likely would have exercised his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent, said Davis.

“Years later, a new trophy hunting District Attorney decided to violate the promises of the prosecutor’s office and filed charges against Cosby,” he said.

Castor testified during a preliminary hearing in the Cosby case that he did indeed have what he called a binding agreement with Cosby and that the deposition should not be used.

The new DA, Kevin Steele, argued that portions of it that are damaging to Cosby should be used.

O’Neill sided with Steele.

“That is tantamount to the judge ensuring a conviction by sneaking evidence in the back door that suggests Cosby is a bad man who has sex outside of marriage and who does drugs and provides drugs to women who are having a relationship with him. Cosby never said in his deposition that he gave them drugs so that they would be unconscious so that he could rape them. This is a pure lie and fraud committed by the mass media,” Davis said.

(To read the full deposition, click here).

A Little About Me: I'm the co-author of Blind Faith: The Miraculous Journey of Lula Hardaway and her son, Stevie Wonder (Simon & Schuster) and Michael Jackson: The Man Behind The Mask, An Insider's Account of the King of Pop (Select Books Publishing, Inc.) My work can often be found in the Washington Informer, Baltimore Times, Philadelphia Tribune, Pocono Record, the New York Post, and Black Press USA.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. Kia Soto

    Kia Soto

    October 1, 2018 at 8:17 am

    @StacyBrownMedia @NNPA_BlackPress The judge needed to assess him as a violent sexual predator for se… https://t.co/goffKEqTX3

  2. SERIAL RAPING MONSTER

    October 1, 2018 at 1:36 pm

    CASTRATE this SERIAL RAPING WILD BEAST !!!

  3. Remy Watson

    October 2, 2018 at 5:10 am

    I find it hard to believe that this “legal expert” is even an expert in anything. They not once, but multiple times use the incorrect verbiage. So it can’t be chocked up to a simple typo, but instead is a straight ignorance of the subject matter in which the person is speaking about. So therefore I’ve come to the conclusion that they know nothing at all about law, because an actual law expert, or even an English major or minor would know that it isn’t “collaborating” or collaborate” but instead the correct terms are “corroborating” and “corroborate”

    Without using the coreect terms you only portray to the audience that you are ignorant about the subject matter that you are speaking about. That in turn, creates a doubt in the readers mind, and makes the reader dismiss the entire article. I’m not talking about simple typo’s here. Im talking about complete ignorance.

  4. Monty

    October 2, 2018 at 8:01 am

    And what verbage is that? Michael Eruc Dyson type where its ummm, and ahhh rahhh! Fact is these experts are correct and they, unlike many, actually followed the trial and not the lies told by Andrea Constand and the media.

  5. Jay Raskin

    October 2, 2018 at 2:01 pm

    Excellent article.
    It listed just eight reasons the trial verdict should be overturned and DA Steele and Judge O’Neill should be investigated for corruption. The number of egregious violations of Dr. Cosby’s human, constitutional, civil and legal rights easily surpasses ten times that number.
    Steele reopened the case with any new evidence. The fact that Dr. Cosby shared quaaludes with a friend in 1975 is not in any way evidence that Dr. Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted somebody in 2004. Millions of people shared quaaludes for recreational purposes in the 1970s. It is absurd to believe that this is evidence that somebody would drug and sexually assault a woman 30 years later. It is evident that Steele reopened the case to help him win election to the DA’s office, a serious crime that Steele should be charged with.
    Judge O’Neill interjected himself into the Cosby case because of his wife, a rape culture activist at the University of Pennsylvania who believes that men accused of rape by any woman should not be allowed to plead innocent as this “revictimizes the woman”. She clearly would profit financially, socially and career-wise by a guilty verdict in the case. O’Neill ignored the law that a judge must not even appear to be biased, let alone be biased, when he took this case knowing himself to be completely biased. O’Neill dishonored all judges by spitting on the law in this way. He may be a hero to his wife and her clique of racist man-haters, but he disgraced the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in the worst way forever by taking this case.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: