-
The Black Press Honors “Giant in the Automotive Industry” James Farmer - 6 hours ago
-
Film Review: With “A Quiet Place” Actor, Director John Krasinski Turns Heads in New Horror Flick - 23 hours ago
-
Black Scholar and Activist Ron Walters Was a Genius, Donna Brazile Says - April 16, 2018
-
PRESS ROOM: NAACP Statement on Starbucks and Growing Climate of Racism and Intolerance - April 16, 2018
-
NNPA Chairman Dorothy Leavell Celebrates 50 Years as Publisher of the Crusader Newspapers - April 16, 2018
-
NNPA National Black Voter Registration Drive Begins in North Carolina - April 16, 2018
-
OPINION: Payday Lenders Wage New Wars against Consumers and Regulation - April 16, 2018
-
OPINION: Black People Must Vote or Reap the Consequences - April 16, 2018
-
OPINION: When the World Attacks You, Find Strength in Christ’s Power - April 13, 2018
-
Former Supermodel, Reality TV Star Janice Dickinson Testifies at Cosby Sexual Assault Trial - April 13, 2018
A Tax on Blackness: Racism is Still Rampant in Real Estate

Jamelle Bouie, SLATE
(Slate) — In 1934, Homer Hoyt wrote a dissertation—“One Hundred Years of Land Values in Chicago: The Relationship of the Growth of Chicago to the Rise of Its Land Values, 1830–1933”—that ranked various races and nationalities by order of “desirability.” Most desired were the old American stock of Anglo-Saxons and Northern Europeans—English, Germans, Scots, Irish, and Scandinavians—followed by Northern Italians, Czechoslovakians, Polish, Lithuanians, Greeks, “Russian Jews of the lower class,” South Italians, and at the bottom of the list, “Negroes and Mexicans.”
Hoyt, as chief economist of the Federal Housing Authority, wanted to improve the accuracy of real-estate appraisals so that an affiliated agency—the Home Owner’ Loan Corporation, established by the Home Owners’ Refinancing Act of 1933—could standardize the process for making mortgage loans, avoid undue risks, and bail out homeowners who lost their homes in the economic crash. Working with Hoyt at the FHA, the HOLC would map cities and divide neighborhoods into various risk categories that were based on his ethnic hierarchy and coded accordingly. A “green” neighborhood was white, affluent, Anglo-Saxon, and appropriately Protestant. A “blue” one had less desirable whites—Jews, Irish, and Italians—but was stable and upwardly mobile. A “yellow” one had undesirable, often working-class whites, and a “red” one was predominantly black or Mexican, regardless of wealth or class. And in these “redlined” areas, loans were either expensive or nonexistent, forcing families to rely on speculators and private sales by unscrupulous homeowners.
###